The characters in Glass
of Water all play a very important and central role in presenting the plot
of this play. That makes it extremely
difficult to narrow down just one protagonist.
It is relatively easy to figure out the antagonist. The duchess makes it pretty obvious that her
motives are not quite pure all of the time.
She messes things up in people’s communication with each other. She convinces the queen of untrue
things. She behaves in very selfish
ways. And it’s just rather easy to
figure out that she’s kind of the one blocking the way of many—well actually
all—of our central characters.
When it comes to the
protagonist, though, I’m much more stumped.
Sometimes, I gauge who the protagonist in a play is based on how much
time they spend on the stage. I’m not
really sure if that’s 100% correct. I
think it probably factors in to some degree, but that’s definitely not the only
thing that makes a protagonist a protagonist.
And even if it was, it wouldn’t help me in this play because all of the
characters have a pretty close to equal amount of time on the stage. The character that I landed on, though, after
much consideration was Bolingbroke. It
seems like much of the plot centers around his desires and his actions. He is trying so hard to create peace between
the two nations. We see him planning his
actions and understand his motives. I
feel like we get to know him more than some of the others. Although, I do notice Abigail and
Masham. They are also extremely
central. They are affected in some way
by every single decision that is made.
Some of the decisions affect whether or not Abigail will be able to have
a place in the queen’s household. Some
of the decisions affect whether Masham will be caught after killing the
laughing man. And other decisions affect
their love life.
As far as protagonists go, though. I’d have to say I’m a bit undecided. I think that that’s alright though. I think that the story is told through
several different perspectives and that is part of what makes the plot
work. There aren’t really many
ambiguities or revelations later in the play because we know what everyone is
planning and thinking. This gives much
more dramatic irony and much less ambiguity, which is one of the defining
characteristics of this play.
No comments:
Post a Comment